Posts Tagged ‘Advertising’

Adwords + Gambling PPC = ?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Over the last few days, I wrote a couple of articles about PPC advertising with Facebook.

This article is about Google Adwords, and my tales of woe…

Widely regarded as *the* PPC proving ground, Adwords is used by countless affiliates.  Because of the enormous market share enjoyed by Google, and the syndication of Adwords feeds through the in-page integration offered by Adsense, the potential audience is almost unimaginable.  As such, it seemed like the place to start for what I was hoping would be a more fruitful campaign…

To create the campaign, I used links from my affiliate provider to get started.  These pointed to various offers by the same casino, so I created different adverts for each offer, varying the wording and creating the perfect ad copy.  I then set my demographic targeting, my budget limits and attempted submission…

Before going any further, it is worth noting the important features of creating an ad:

The Adwords advert creation box

The first problem that may be encountered is with the “Display URL” and “Destination URL” data:  A lot of affiliate links provided by 3rd party companies do not link directly to the target site.  I found that this can be something of an issue, as Google immediately picks up the difference between the URLs (regardless of the final destination) and disallows the ad.  Furthermore, if one is fortunate enough to get past this hurdle, Google’s advertising terms forbids the use of pages which perform a redirect…

You’ve guessed it, I fell foul of both.  There have been various suggestions about how to get around this, including using a time delay in the redirect to “fool” Google into thinking that the page is a static part of the site – I’m not sure this actually works, or that you would get away with it for very long…

Back to the drawing board then. For my second attempt, I tried a link to a poker site at which I’m a member

Display URL = Check

Destination URL = Check

No problems then? Wrong.  What I’d not realised was that Google’s policy on gambling advertising insists upon having a gambling certificate.  Bearing in mind I wouldn’t wish to do anything illegal, I called the Gambling Commission for advice…

I was told that I didn’t need a gambling license, nor would I be issued one – why? Because I don’t operate a company that takes wagers.

I though that this must be a mistake on Google’s behalf… Get hold of them, let them know what I was told by the Gambling Commission and everthing will be fine, right? No.

Despite all of this, Google’s representative insisted that, even if I was advertising a casino (who held a license), I would need to be individually certified in order to advertise. Game over.

Find out in the next article how I got on with non-gambling advertising – if nothing else, it’s cheap laugh.

A word from our sponsor:

Like gambling? Want a big casino bonus, a match bonus, or free gambling strategy guides? Come to Biggest Bingo Bonuses for all this and more!

Facebook Ads (Part 2)

Saturday, March 6th, 2010
Facebook Ads Part 2

PPC advertising was disappointing...

In “Facebook Ads (Part 1)“, I had a bit of a whinge about their advertising policies of the time.  Not to be discouraged by a minor setback (and still hard-up), I changed tack: Non-gambling ads. There shouldn’t be any problem there, right? Again, I am pre-empting the inevitable comments when I say that I know that PPC advertising is not any guarantee of making money. It has to be said, though, that I didn’t realise quite how poor it would be.

I placed a number of adverts, worded carefully and with no enticing pitch. Not a usual tactic for advertising, I hear some say… But it is when you are paying per click! The rationale here was to ensure (in so far as is possible) that anyone clicking on the advert, with its plain and honest text, was more likely to be interested in the product.  More than this, I even targeted ads by demographic – who could want cheaper car insurance more than 17-27 year old males..? I set my daily budget, watched and waited (after the annoying wait described in Part 1)…

Results: Millions of impressions, hundreds of clicks, no conversions.

I’m not at all concerned about the impression:click ratio – I wasn’t paying for impressions and the ad wasn’t designed to grab every viewer’s attention, so no problem. I was disappointed with the conversion rate for clicks: Accross all the advertising campaigns I ran (>1,000 clicks) I didn’t achieve a single conversion. Not one.
From reseach into PPC, one might be led to believe that a 1% conversion rate is low, but 0%?

Down (but not necessarily out) I did some more research and found that my experience was not unique – It may not suprise you to read that I no longer advertise with Facebook, in any capacity.
There is a happy ending though: I did manage to scratch enough cash together in the end for web hosting and bills…

Facebook Ads (Part 1)

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Facebook = poor conversion rate?

A while ago, I was pretty hard-up: Web hosting fees were due, bills – I’ll save you the sob story!
Coming to the point, I investigated boosting traffic and marketing with Facebook advertising, looking to encourage a target audience to visit, or promote products for comission.  How did I fare?

Not well..Here is part 1 of why not:
Facebook has some “interesting” policies in regards to advertising.  One of these covers extremely irritating delays, while adverts are screened.  Before anyone points out the pitfalls of unfettered access to advertising media, I  understand why this needs to happen to some degree- I don’t particularly want my (admittedly most used) social networking portal to be covered in adverts for viagra, get-rich-quick schemes and some kind of “manual male enhancement device”. I do, however, want my advert to be reviewed in good time, not delayed for several days and then falling foul of their “ban” on gambling promotion.  I say “ban”, as I pressed the Facebook employee as to why my adverts for a review site were not approved, yet there are a plethora of adverts for casinos and poker sites… After some email back-and-forth, I was rewarded with an interesting revelation:  The “ban” is not a blanket ban – it is a selective ban.

You see, it transpires that you *can* advertise gambling on Facebook, but only by entering into a formal agreement in which you are obliged to spend a minimum of US$30,000 per annum.

I know that sites have a duty to their visitors, but I feel somewhat annoyed when the moral grandstanding is a facade for protecting lucrative advertising revenue.

I notice that the terms describing the prohibited nature of gambling promotion have since changed to include the all-important phrase “without authorisation from Facebook”. A nice retrospective bit of arse-covering.